GMOs

30 June 2011

"The de facto exclusion of GMOs from the Aarhus Convention was not due to scientific certainty or lack of public interest but was due to a very unfortunate constellation of lack of political will at a certain historical moment."

29 June 2011

Today "Business and Industry" entered the stage. Again compared to the CBD negotiations I'm used to there is little industry present: so far there are only four them, which makes their background even more remarkable.
Out of the four: three directly represent the biotech industry: EuropaBio (represented by a fromer Monsanto employee), CropLife and European Crop Protection Association (biotech looby organisations in the EU). The fourth one comes from the International Chamber of Commerce, an organisation that repeatedly works to make sure that biotech companies are not hindered by national or international legislations.
What are they doing here? Some countries, esp. some of the EU states have regional and national regulation that forces companies to be open about field trials with genetically modified crops, about GMOs in food and feed, about locations of trials and what they are planning to do to restrict the spreading of GMOs into the environment. Again and again there are attempts to reduce such information, again and again vital information is simply declared as "confidential business information" and kept secret.
In this climate, the Parties to the Aarhus Convention managed to approve the Almanty GMO amendment in 2005 - an amendment to the original protocol that explicitely spells out obligations for access to information for GMOs. This amendment will come into force once 27 countries have ratified it. This number has now stagnated at 26.

7 April 2011

Last week I attended this year's meeting of the Informal Advisory Committee of the Biosafety Clearing House (BCH).
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety regulates the international trade with living GMOs, and one of it's key components is its clearing house. The BCH collects all the data countries have about GMOs from data about the individual GMOs, its transgenic constructs and risk assessments to national laws and decisions taken about import and cultivation. Given such diverse information, and the need to cross-reference a lot between records, the site still manages to look quite calm and accessible.
But what really made my day was the advanced search. Users can add additional type of records using "and", "or" and "not" and the queries constructed that way, are displayed graphically so that you can see easily how the different criteria relate to each other.